0C18OYAU7SZ598 Ladies’s sillian 2. 0 ease loafer

(8 customer reviews)


  • imported
  • synthetic sole
  • shaft measures about low-pinnacle from arch
  • heel height 1. 73 inches
  • clarks cloudsteppers
  • removable ortholite footbed
  • consolation features: ortholite cushioning, clean fabric linings, durable eva outsole, extremely-lightweight, breathable, hook and loop adjustability
SKU: C18OYAU7SZ598 Category: Tag:

product description

the next evolution of our beloved sillian shoes, the sillian 2. 0 ease, packs a complete 18mm of underfoot cushioning, plus 15mm of light-weight eva within the outsole. This loafer is even adjustable- way to a rip-tape strap. Easy textile linings maintain feel cool- perfect for barefoot put on and wicking moisture. A fully removable ortholite footbed and cushion gentle padding end the task of making each step a breeze.


5, 5.5, 6, 6 Wide, 6.5, 6.5 Wide, 7, 7 Wide, 7.5, 7.5 Wide, 8, 8 Wide, 8.5, 8.5 Wide, 9, 9 Wide, 9.5, 9.5 Wide, 10, 10 Wide, 11, 11 Wide, 12, 12 Wide


Black Synthetic Nubuck, Maroon Synthetic Nubuck, Grey Synthetic, Navy Synthetic, Grey

8 reviews for 0C18OYAU7SZ598 Ladies’s sillian 2. 0 ease loafer

  1. Kindle Customer

    The Cloud Stepper Silian Bella Mary Janes are my favorite shoes. I have 5 pairs of them in 3 colors and wear them almost every day. However, as the weather gets colder, I wanted an option that covered more of my foot and that I could wear socks with without them showing. These looked like a great cold weather substitute.Alas, they are not. These run way bigger than the mary janes. Even with socks on, I can fit my entire index finger in the heel of the shoe. When I do that, the arch falls at the right place. Without my foot being shoved up like that, the footbed support is not comfortable.It’s very disappointing that the fit on this is so different from another shoe in the same line. Now I’ll have to pay $6 to ship them back and decide if I want to take a chance on going down a half size.I am giving them 3 stars because I think they would be very comfortable if they fit correctly.Read more

  2. Taylor

    I wanted to wear these a few times before I wrote a review. I have owned the original Sillians and now the 2.0 version. I, personally, believe the originals are WAY better than the new version. I am constantly on the move for 12 hours at my job so finding a comfortable shoe is a must! I would definitely say that they run on the larger side. I am normally a 7.5 regular width but found these to be rather loose. I can slip them off without having to undo the velcro. They have left blisters on my heels after almost every wear. I have been wearing bandaids and thicker socks to try to save my feet. I really do hope the rubbing stops because I had high hopes for these shoes! The insoles are phenomenal though.Read more

  3. Deanie Harrison

    Disappointing because they are lower quality than usual. I am wondering if these are actually Clarks shoes, especially with such inconsistent sizing. I always wear a size 8 in Clarks and this pair is at least 1 size too small. This is the second pair I’ve purchased on Amazon through a third party seller and the previous ones were 2 sizes too small. At the time I made the purchase, it appeared that the “seller’ was Clark’s, but it was not.Read more

  4. Mrs. Mac

    I’ve been wearing Clarks shoes for years because I like the casual styles and their pain-free fit for my hammer toes. I’m also able to buy wide width from Clarks [although my feet aren’t wide, the wide width alleviates the pain from my hammer toes]. Unfortunately, the last two pairs of shoes that I bought on line from Clarks in my normal size were way too large. The style that I’m rating is one that not only was too large, but its style/cut would not allow me to use the orthotics that I wear in my shoes. The quality also was cheap looking. I then decided to go to the Clarks shoe store in the outlet mall near my home. Sadly, they had virtually no shoes in my size with wide width. So, for now, I will not purchase Clarks. They seem to have not only changed their sizing but also are using cheaper materials in their shoes, which used to be top quality.Read more

  5. Grateful

    I normally love cloudsteppers, but these didn’t work on the first try for my feet. (I’ll update if something changes)Pro’s+ Color+ DesignCon’s- Back of shoe is uncomfortable, and actually cut my photo (bleeding, irritation)Read more

  6. camcam6

    Not only did these shoes fit very well, but they are so comfortable.Clark’s Cloudstepper’s have made my feet great after years of discomfort with regular shoes.I just ordered another pair.Read more

  7. Patches67

    These are a decent enough shoe…but for me they were too tight in the toe area. Also…the style …for me..was a bit boxy. But then I wear a larger size…if you have little feet…these might be just right…just not for me. Good quality shoe though.Read more

  8. T.J. Tuytschaevers

    I found the shoes to be extremely comfortable. I have problems wearing shoes with an enclosed back. I was able to wear these all day for the first time and had no problems. Great fit! Love these shoes! Worth the money!Read more

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart